Home  ›  What Happened to Reactor 3 Cooling Pond Fukushima

What Happened to Reactor 3 Cooling Pond Fukushima

Written By Saturday 2 April 2022 Add Comment Edit
Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster
Fukushima I by Digital Globe.jpg

Satellite image on sixteen March 2011 of the four damaged reactor buildings
Date eleven March 2011 (2011-03-11)
Location Ōkuma, Fukushima, Nihon
Coordinates 37°25′17″Northward 141°1′57″East  /  37.42139°Due north 141.03250°E  / 37.42139; 141.03250
Outcome INES Level 7 (ratings by Japanese authorities every bit of xi April)[1] [2]
Non-fatal injuries 37 with concrete injuries,[iii]
2 workers taken to infirmary with radiation burns[4]

Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster (Unit 3 Reactor) is located in Japan

Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster (Unit 3 Reactor)

Location in Nippon
External video
video icon 24 hours live camera for Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster on YouTube, certified past Tokyo Electrical Ability Co. Inc.

Unit 3 of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant (犏島第䞀原子力発電所3号機の建蚭 Fukushima Daiichi Genshiryoku Hatsudensho Sangoki no Kensetsu) was one of the reactors in operation on 11 March 2011, when the plant was struck past the tsunami produced by the Tohoku convulsion. In the aftermath, the reactor experienced hydrogen gas explosions and suffered a partial meltdown, along with the other 2 reactors in operation at the time the tsunami struck, unit of measurement 1 and unit 2. Efforts to remove debris and coolant h2o contaminated with radiation are ongoing and expected to concluding several decades.

2011 tsunami and backwash [edit]

The Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster ( 犏島第䞀原子力発電所事故 , Fukushima Dai-ichi ( audio speaker icon pronunciation ) genshiryoku hatsudensho jiko ) was a series of equipment failures, nuclear meltdowns, and releases of radioactive materials at the Fukushima I Nuclear Power Plant, following the Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami on 11 March 2011.[5] [6] It is the largest nuclear disaster since the Chernobyl disaster of 1986.[7]

The plant comprises 6 separate humid water reactors originally designed by General Electric (GE), and maintained by the Tokyo Electrical Power Company (TEPCO). At the fourth dimension of the quake, Reactor 4 had been de-fueled while 5 and 6 were in the common cold shutdown for planned maintenance.[8] Immediately after the convulsion, the remaining reactors 1-3 shut down automatically, and emergency generators came online to control electronics and coolant systems. However, the seismic sea wave following the earthquake quickly flooded the low-lying rooms in which the emergency generators were housed. The flooded generators failed, cutting power to the critical pumps that must continuously circulate coolant water through a nuclear reactor for several days in order to keep it from melting down after beingness shut downwards. As the pumps stopped, the reactors overheated due to the normal loftier radioactive decay heat produced in the first few days later nuclear reactor shutdown (smaller amounts of this heat normally proceed to exist released for years, merely are not enough to cause fuel melting).

At this point, only prompt flooding of the reactors with seawater could accept cooled the reactors quickly enough to forbid a meltdown. Saltwater flooding was delayed because information technology would ruin the plush reactors permanently. Flooding with seawater was finally commenced only afterwards the government ordered that seawater be used, and at this signal, information technology was already too late to prevent meltdown.[9]

Every bit the water boiled away in the reactors and the water levels in the fuel rod pools dropped, the reactor fuel rods began to overheat severely, and to melt down. In the hours and days that followed, Reactors 1, 2 and iii experienced full meltdown.[10] [11]

In the intense heat and force per unit area of the melting reactors, a reaction between the nuclear fuel metallic cladding and the remaining water surrounding them produced explosive hydrogen gas. Equally workers struggled to cool and shut downwardly the reactors, several hydrogen-air chemical explosions occurred.[12] [13]

Concerns almost the repeated small explosions, the atmospheric venting of radioactive gasses, and the possibility of larger explosions led to a 20 km (12 mi)-radius evacuation around the institute. During the early days of the accident, workers were temporarily evacuated at various times for radiation safety reasons. At the same time, seawater that had been exposed to the melting rods was returned to the ocean heated and radioactive in big volumes for several months until recirculating units could be put in place to repeatedly absurd and re-use a express quantity of h2o for cooling. The earthquake damage and flooding in the wake of the tsunami hindered external assist. Electric power was slowly restored for some of the reactors, allowing for automated cooling.[xiv]

Japanese officials initially assessed the blow as Level 4 on the International Nuclear Event Calibration (INES) despite the views of other international agencies that it should be college. The level was later raised to 5 and somewhen to vii, the maximum scale value.[15] The Japanese government and TEPCO have been criticized in the foreign printing for poor advice with the public and improvised cleanup efforts.[16] [17] [18] On 20 March, the Principal Chiffonier Secretarial assistant Yukio Edano appear that the plant would be decommissioned once the crunch was over.

The Japanese government estimates the total amount of radioactivity released into the atmosphere was approximately ane-tenth equally much as was released during the Chernobyl disaster.[19] Significant amounts of radioactive material have also been released into basis and body of water waters. Measurements taken by the Japanese regime xxx–50 km from the plant showed caesium-137 levels loftier enough to cause concern,[xx] leading the government to ban the auction of nutrient grown in the surface area. Tokyo officials temporarily recommended that tap water should not be used to prepare food for infants.[21] [22] In May 2012, TEPCO reported that at to the lowest degree 900 PBq had been released "into the temper in March last year [2011] alone" although it has been said staff may have been told to prevarication, and requite faux readings to try and cover up truthful levels of radiation.[23] [24]

An "Official Apply Only" report obtained by FOIA from the United states Nuclear Regulatory Commission (three/eighteen/2011) written ane week after the tsunami hit Fukushima states, "The source term provided to NARAC was: (1) 25% of the total fuel in unit 2 released to the atmosphere, (2) 50% of the total spent fuel from unit three was released to the atmosphere, and (3) 100% of the total spent fuel was released to the temper from unit iv".[25] NARAC produced a "worst example" speculative model based on these assumptions. All the same, this model did non include an supposition of a release from Unit one, and the assumption of "100% of the total spent fuel was released to the atmosphere from unit 4" has since been proven incorrect with the subsequent removal of the fuel from the spent pool fuel.

A few of the institute's workers were severely injured or killed by the disaster conditions resulting from the earthquake. There were no immediate deaths due to directly radiation exposures, just at least six workers have exceeded lifetime legal limits for radiations and more than than 300 have received significant radiation doses. Predicted hereafter cancer deaths due to accumulated radiation exposures in the population living virtually Fukushima have ranged from none[26] to 100[27] to a non-peer-reviewed "guesstimate"[28] of 1,000.[xix] On sixteen December 2011, Japanese regime declared the plant to exist stable, although it would take decades to decontaminate the surrounding areas and to decommission the found altogether.[29] On 5 July 2012, the parliament appointed The Fukushima Nuclear Accident Independent Investigation Commission (NAIIC) submitted its inquiry written report to the Japanese parliament,[30] while the government appointed Investigation Commission on the Accident at the Fukushima Nuclear Power Stations of Tokyo Electric Power Company submitted its final report to the Japanese government on 23 July 2012.[31] Tepco admitted for the get-go time on 12 October 2012 that it had failed to accept stronger measures to foreclose disasters for fearfulness of inviting lawsuits or protests against its nuclear plants.[32] [33] [34] [35]

Unit 3 Reactor [edit]

Reactor Unit three (right) and Unit of measurement 4 (left) on 16 March.
Three of the reactors at Fukushima Daiichi overheated, causing meltdowns which released large amounts of radioactive material into the air.
Pipes are the management of the ocean.[36]

Unlike the other 5 reactor units, reactor 3 ran on mixed cadre, containing both uranium fuel and mixed uranium and plutonium oxide, or MOX fuel (with the core comprising ~6% MOX fuel[37]), during a loss of cooling accident in a subcritical reactor MOX fuel will not behave differently from UOX fuel. The key difference between plutonium-239 and uranium-235 is that plutonium emits fewer delayed neutrons than uranium when it undergoes fission.[38]

While water-insoluble forms of plutonium such every bit plutonium dioxide are very harmful to the lungs, this toxicity is non relevant during a Loss of Coolant Accident (LOCA) considering plutonium is very involatile and unlikely to leave the reactor in large amounts. Plutonium dioxide has a very high boiling point. The toxic effect of the plutonium to the public under these conditions is much less than that of iodine-131 and caesium. During a loss of cooling accident, the fuel is not subject to such intense mechanical stresses, so the release of radioactivity is controlled by the boiling signal of the unlike elements present.[39]

Cooling problems [edit]

Following the reactor SCRAM, operators activated the reactor core isolation cooling organization (RCIC) and the residual heat removal system and core spray systems were made bachelor to absurd the suppression pool; whether they were activated prior to the seismic sea wave has not been made clear. The RHRS and CS pumps were knocked out of committee by the tsunami. With DC battery power remaining, the RCIC continued to keep the h2o level stable, and the operators switched to the loftier-pressure coolant injection (HPCI) system when water level began to drop. On 13 March, the HPCI system failed, the reason for which is not completely articulate due to instrumentation not being available. It is believed to be either due to loss of DC power due to depletion of batteries or to reactor pressure dropping below the level at which it can operate. Operators were unable to restart it as batteries were exhausted. After this, the operators were unable to beginning the RCIC system and began injecting seawater. Although information technology was not clear at the fourth dimension, some of the fuel in Reactor three apparently melted around 60 hours after the convulsion (the nighttime of the 12th to 13th).[40]

Early on on 13 March an official of the Japan Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency (NISA) told at a news conference that the emergency cooling system of Unit 3 had failed, spurring an urgent search for a means to supply cooling water to the reactor vessel to prevent a meltdown of its reactor core.[41] At 05:38 there was no means of calculation coolant to the reactor, owing to loss of power. Work to restore power and to vent excessive pressure level continued.[42] At 1 point, the elevation iii meters of the uranium/mixed oxide (MOX) fuel rods were not covered by coolant.[43]

At 07:30 JST, TEPCO prepared to release radioactive steam, indicating that "the amount of radiation to be released would exist small and non of a level that would affect man wellness"[44] and manual venting took place at 08:41 and 09:twenty.[45] At 09:25 JST on 13 March, operators began injecting water containing boric acid into the primary containment vessel (PCV) via the pump of a burn truck.[46] [47] When water levels continued to autumn and pressure to ascent, the injected water was switched to seawater at 13:12.[42] By xv:00 it was noted that despite adding water the level in the reactor did not rise and radiation had increased.[48] A ascension was somewhen recorded merely the level stuck at 2 m below the elevation of reactor core. Other readings suggested that this could not exist the case and the gauge was malfunctioning.[45]

Injection of seawater into the main containment vessel (PCV) was discontinued at 01:10 on 14 March because all the water in the reserve pool had been used up. Supplies were restored past 03:20 and injection of water resumed.[47] On the morning of 15 March, Secretary Edano announced that according to TEPCO, at ane location near reactor Units 3 and four, radiation at an equivalent dose rate of 400 mSv/h was detected.[3] [49] [50] This might accept been due to debris from the explosion in Unit 4.[51]

Explosion [edit]

At 12:33 JST on 13 March, the principal spokesman of the Japanese government, Yukio Edano said hydrogen gas was building upwardly inside the outer building of Unit 3 just every bit had occurred in Unit i, threatening the aforementioned kind of explosion.[ citation needed ] At eleven:15 JST on xiv March, the envisaged explosion of the building surrounding Reactor three of Fukushima i occurred, owing to the ignition of built-upward hydrogen gas.[52] [53] The Nuclear and Industrial Prophylactic Agency of Nippon (NISA) reported, as with Unit 1, the summit section of the reactor building was diddled apart, but the inner containment vessel was not breached. The explosion was larger than that in Unit 1 and felt 40 kilometers abroad. Pressure readings within the reactor remained steady at around 380 kPa at 11:thirteen and 360 kPa at 11:55 compared to nominal levels of 400 kPa and a maximum recorded of 840 kPa. Water injection continued. Dose rates of 0.05 mSv/h were recorded in the service hall and of 0.02 mSv/h at the plant entrance.[54]

Eleven people were reported injured in the blast.[55] TEPCO and NISA announced that four TEPCO employees, three subcontractor employees, and iv Self-Defence-Force soldiers were injured.[56] [57] [58] Six armed services personnel from the Ground Self Defense force Force's Cardinal Nuclear Biological Chemical Weapon Defense force Unit, led by Colonel Shinji Iwakuma, had just arrived outside the reactor to spray information technology with water and were exiting their vehicles when the explosion occurred. Iwakuma later said that TEPCO had not informed them that there was a danger of a hydrogen explosion in the reactor, adding, "Tokyo Electric was drastic to stabilize (the plant), so I am not aroused at them. If there is a possibility of an explosion, I would be reluctant to send my men there."[59]

Possibility of criticality in the spent fuel pool [edit]

TEPCO claimed that there was a small but non-zero probability that the exposed fuel assemblies in the Unit 4 reactor could reach criticality.[60] [61] The BBC commented that criticality would never hateful a nuclear explosion, only could cause a sustained release of radioactive materials.[60] Criticality is ordinarily considered highly unlikely, attributable to the low enrichment level used in light water reactors.[62] [63] [64] American nuclear engineer Arnold Gundersen, noting the much greater power and vertical debris ejection compared to the Unit 1 hydrogen nail, has theorized that the Unit iii explosion involved a prompt criticality in the spent fuel puddle material, triggered by the mechanical disruption of an initial, smaller hydrogen gas explosion in the building.[65]

On eleven May, TEPCO released underwater robotic video from the spent fuel pool. The video appears to show large amounts of debris contaminating the pool. Based on water samples analysed, unnamed experts and TEPCO reported that the fuel rods were left "largely undamaged",[66] [67] and that it appears that the Unit of measurement iii explosion was entirely related to hydrogen buildup within the building from venting of the reactor.

Cooling efforts [edit]

Around 10:00 JST on 16 March, NHK helicopters flying thirty km abroad videotaped white fumes rise from the Fukushima I facility. Officials suggested that the Reactor 3 edifice was the most probable source, and said that its containment systems may have been breached.[68] The control room for Reactors 3 and 4 was evacuated at 10:45 JST simply staff were cleared to render and resume water injection into the reactor at xi:xxx JST.[69] At xvi:12 JST, Self Defense Force (SDF) Chinook helicopters were preparing to cascade water on Unit three, where white fumes rising from the edifice was believed to be water humid away from the fuel rod cooling pond on the top flooring of the reactor building, and on Unit of measurement four where the cooling pool was also short of h2o. The mission was cancelled when helicopter measurements reported radiation levels of fifty mSv.[70] [71] At 21:06 pm JST, the government reported that major harm to Reactor three was unlikely but that it yet remained their highest priority.[72]

Early on on 17 March, TEPCO requested another attempt by the military machine to put water on the reactor using a helicopter[73] and four helicopter drops of seawater took place around x:00 JST.[74] The riot police used a water cannon to spray water onto the top of the reactor building then were replaced by members of the SDF with spray vehicles. On 18 March, a crew of firemen took over the chore with half dozen fire engines each spraying half-dozen tons of water in 40 minutes. 30 further hyper rescue vehicles were involved in spraying operations.[75] Spraying continued each mean solar day to 23 March considering of concerns the explosion in Unit 3 may accept damaged the pool (total 3,742 tonnes of water sprayed upwards to 22 March) with changing crews to minimise radiations exposure.[iii] Lighting in the control room was restored on 22 March later a connexion was made to a new grid power supply, and by 24 March information technology was possible to add together 35 tonnes of seawater to the spent fuel pool using the cooling and purification organisation.[76] On 21 March grey smoke was reported to be rising from the southeast corner of Unit three – where the spent fuel pool is located. Workers were evacuated from the expanse. TEPCO claimed no significant change in radiation levels, and the smoke subsided later the same day.[77]

On 23 March, black fume billowed from Unit 3, prompting some other evacuation of workers from the plant, though Tokyo Electric Ability Co. officials said there had been no corresponding fasten in radiation at the plant. "We don't know the reason for the smoke", Hidehiko Nishiyama of the Nuclear Safety Agency said.[78]

On 24 March, three workers entered the basement of the turbine building and were exposed to radiation when they stepped into contaminated water. 2 of them were not wearing high boots and received beta ray burns. They were hospitalized, but their injuries were not life-threatening.[79]

From 25 March, the source of h2o existence injected into the core was switched from seawater to freshwater.[80]

In Baronial, TEPCO began considering changing the core injection method for the no. 3 reactor as information technology required a much larger quantity of water to cool and the temperatures remained relatively high compared to the nos. 1 and ii reactors which required far less h2o. TEPCO has hypothesized that this may be because some fuel is still present above the core support plate inside the pressure vessel of the no. 3 reactor in addition to the fuel that has fallen to the bottom of the pressure vessel. The fuel on the bottom would be easily cooled by the existing method, but as the pressure vessel is leaking, any fuel located on the back up plate was likely only existence cooled due to the steam generated past the cooling of the melted fuel at the lesser. TEPCO began considering utilizing the reactor'south core spray organization pipes every bit an additional path of water injection then reduce the corporeality of water through the existing feedwater piping system. A team of workers were sent inside the reactor building to inspect the cadre spray system pipes, and it was found that the piping was undamaged. Hoses were so run from the temporary injection pumps located outside the building and connected to the core spray arrangement piping. On 1 September, TEPCO began injecting water using the new route. The new injection method has been considerably more than effective in lowering the temperature of the reactor to below 100 degrees Celsius. As of 27 September, most of the no. 3 reactor's temperature readings are between 70 and eighty degrees Celsius. Later, TEPCO began utilizing the aforementioned method in the no. 2 reactor; it has not had as pregnant effect on the no. two reactor equally it did on the no. 3.[81]

Further developments [edit]

Unit 3 reactor temperatures, xix March to 28 May

On 25 March 2011, officials announced the reactor vessel might be breached and leaking radioactive fabric. High radiations levels from contaminated water prevented work.[82] Japan Nuclear and Industrial Safety Bureau (NISA) reiterated concerns about a Unit 3 alienation on xxx March.[83] NHK Globe reported the NISA's concerns as "air may exist leaking", very probably through "weakened valves, pipes and openings nether the reactors where the control rods are inserted", but that "there is no indication of large cracks or holes in the reactor vessels".[83] As with the other reactors, water was transferred from condenser reservoirs to the suppression pool surge tanks and so that condensers could exist used to hold radioactive water pumped from the basement.[84]

On 17 April, remote control robots were used to enter the Reactor Building and performed a series of inspections.[fourscore] On 27 April, TEPCO revised its approximate of damaged fuel in Unit 3 from 25% to xxx%.[85] Radiation measurements of the water in the Unit 3 spent fuel pool were reported at 140 kBq of radioactive caesium-134 per cubic centimeter, 150 kBq of caesium-137 per cubic centimeter, and eleven kBq per cubic centimeter of iodine-131 on 10 May.[67]

On 15 May, TEPCO revealed that the pressure vessel that holds nuclear fuel "is likely to exist damaged and leaking water at Units ii and three", which meant nearly of the thousands of tons of water pumped into the reactors had leaked.[86] On 23 May, TEPCO reported that Reactor 3 had suffered a meltdown some sixty hours after the earthquake.[40]

On 9 June, staff entered the Reactor Edifice to conduct radiation surveys.[80] On 25 June and the post-obit twenty-four hours boric acrid dissolved in 90 tons of water was pumped into the spent fuel pool of Reactor three. Concrete debris from the March hydrogen explosion of the reactor building has been detected in the spent fuel pool. In June TEPCO discovered that the h2o in the pool was strongly alkaline metal: the pH had reached a value of 11.ii. Leaching of calcium hydroxide (portlandite) or calcium silicate hydrate (CSH) from the concrete could have caused this. The alkaline metal water could accelerate the corrosion of the aluminium racks holding the spent fuel rods. If the fuel assemblies would fall, this could pb to re-criticality. In the concurrently preparative works began to install a recirculation cooling arrangement at the fuel puddle, that should exist operational in the offset weeks of July.[87]

On 14 July, TEPCO began injecting nitrogen into the containment vessel, which was expected to reduce the likelihood of further hydrogen explosions.[80] On i July, the spent fuel pool was switched from the water-injection cooling system to a circulatory cooling organization.[80] Later 2 July, the Reactor was cooled using fresh water treated by the on-site water treatment plant.[80]

On 11 January 2012, radioactively contaminated water was found in two tunnels. On 12 Jan, TEPCO admitted that effectually 300 cubic meters of water had accumulated in a tunnel nigh reactor No.3, with electrical cables. Radioactive caesium was measured in concentrations varying from 49 to 69 becquerels per cubic centimeter. Smaller amounts of contaminated water with lower concentrations caesium was establish in a tunnel about reactor no.i. How the h2o could accumulate at these places was under test.[88]

In a study that began ii months after the earthquake and tsunami, mutant butterflies were plant and are considered a possible reaction to the Fukushima nuclear disaster. Some of the collywobbles had abnormalities in their legs, antennae, and abdomens, and dents in their eyes.[89]

In the forenoon of 18 July 2013 at 8:20 a.m. (2320 GMT) small amounts of steam escaped from the reactor building. Video images made by a subcontractor, filming the destroyed edifice and preparing to remove rubble from the place, showed some vapors ascension, but information technology was unclear where it came from. Although there was no change in the afternoon, TEPCO said that radiation levels did not alter, and the reactor was notwithstanding cooled.[90] According to TEPCO pelting could have found its manner to the chief containment of the reactor, and because this vessel was even so hot, it could cause the steam.[91] The next day at 7:55 a.yard. the steam was gone. Because the radiation levels were too high all work to remove rubble was done by remote control. Operations stopped afterwards the steam was found. According to TEPCO the pelting on 17 and eighteen July was to blame.[92] On 18 July the actual dosage measurement was 562 millisieverts per hour, therefore the NRA ordered TEPCO to make further investigations. On 23 July at 9:05 the steam was seen again coming out of the 5th floor just above the reactor containment. The night before a pelting shower did hit the building, and h2o might have reached the - 38C - reactor container lid, or might take reached hot fuel left backside in the reactor vessel. At that moment, the ambience temperature was 20.3 C, and the humidity was 91.2 pct. All piece of work removing rubble from the place was halted.[93] During the last result, radiations levels were measured at 24 locations around the 5th floor of the reactor building. The dosage ranged betwixt 137 millisieverts and 2,170 millisieverts per hour.[94]

Run across too [edit]

  • List of civilian nuclear accidents
  • Lists of nuclear disasters and radioactive incidents
  • Timeline of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster
  • Comparing of Fukushima and Chernobyl nuclear accidents

References [edit]

  1. ^ Negishi, Mayumi (12 April 2011). "Japan raises nuclear crunch severity to highest level". Reuters.
  2. ^ "Fukushima accident upgraded to severity level 7". IEEE Spectrum. 12 April 2011.
  3. ^ a b c "IAEA Update on Nippon Convulsion". Retrieved 16 March 2011. As reported earlier, a 400 millisieverts (mSv) per 60 minutes radiations dose observed at Fukushima Daiichi occurred between 1s 3 and iv. This is a high dose-level value, just information technology is a local value at a single location and at a certain bespeak in time. The IAEA continues to confirm the evolution and value of this dose charge per unit .... because of this detected value, the non-indispensable staff was evacuated from the found, in line with the Emergency Response Plan, and that the population around the constitute is already evacuated.
  4. ^ "Radiations-exposed workers to be treated at Chiba infirmary". Kyodo News. 25 March 2011. Archived from the original on 17 February 2013. Retrieved 17 April 2011.
  5. ^ "Japan'southward unfolding disaster 'bigger than Chernobyl'". The New Zealand Herald. 2 April 2011.
  6. ^ "Explainer: What went wrong in Japan's nuclear reactors". IEEE Spectrum. four April 2011.
  7. ^ "Analysis: A month on, Japan nuclear crisis still scarring" Archived xiv April 2011 at the Wayback Motorcar International Business organization Times (Australia). 9 April 2011, retrieved 12 April 2011; excerpt, According to James Acton, Acquaintance of the Nuclear Policy Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, "Fukushima is not the worst nuclear accident always simply it is the most complicated and the most dramatic ... This was a crisis that played out in real time on TV. Chernobyl did not."
  8. ^ Black, Richard (15 March 2011). "Reactor alienation worsens prospects". BBC Online . Retrieved 23 March 2011.
  9. ^ F. Tanabe, Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, 2011, volume 48, issue viii, pages 1135 to 1139
  10. ^ "3 nuclear reactors melted downward afterwards quake, Japan confirms". CNN. 7 June 2011. Retrieved 13 July 2011.
  11. ^ "'Melt-through' at Fukushima? / Govt report to IAEA suggests state of affairs worse than meltdown". Yomiuri. 8 June 2011. Archived from the original on xv June 2011. Retrieved 8 June 2011.
  12. ^ "Fukushima nuclear accident update log, updates of 15 March 2011". IAEA. 15 March 2011. Retrieved 8 May 2011.
  13. ^ Hydrogen explosions Fukushima nuclear establish: what happened? Archived ii Dec 2013 at the Wayback Machine
  14. ^ Stricken reactors may get power Sunday, The Wall Street Journal, 19 March 2011
  15. ^ Justin McCurry. Nihon raises nuclear warning level to seven. The Guardian. 12 April 2011
  16. ^ Wagner, Wieland (15 March 2011). "Problematic public relations: Japanese leaders leave people in the dark". Der Spiegel . Retrieved nineteen March 2011.
  17. ^ "China urges Nihon'southward openness among panic buying of salt". Channel NewsAsia. Agence France-Presse. 17 March 2011. Archived from the original on thirteen Apr 2020. Retrieved 17 March 2011.
  18. ^ Veronika Hackenbroch, Cordula Meyer and Thilo Thielke (5 April 2011). "A hapless Fukushima clean-upwardly effort". Der Spiegel.
  19. ^ a b von Hippel, Frank North. (September 2011). "The radiological and psychological consequences of the Fukushima Daiichi accident". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 67 (5): 27–36. Bibcode:2011BuAtS..67e..27V. doi:10.1177/0096340211421588.
  20. ^ "Caesium fallout from Fukushima rivals Chernobyl". New Scientist. Archived from the original on one Apr 2011. Retrieved 30 March 2011.
  21. ^ Japan mulls Fukushima food ban: IAEA, Reuters, nineteen March 2011
  22. ^ Justin McCurry in Osaka (23 March 2010). "Tokyo water unsafe for infants afterwards high radiation levels detected". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 23 March 2011.
  23. ^ "TEPCO puts radiation release early in Fukushima crisis at 900 PBq". Kyodo News. 24 May 2012. Archived from the original on 24 May 2012. Retrieved 24 May 2012.
  24. ^ Kevin Krolicki (24 May 2012). "Fukushima radiation college than first estimated". Reuters . Retrieved 24 May 2012.
  25. ^ http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML1212/ML12122A949.pdf[ full commendation needed ]
  26. ^ "Trauma, Non Radiation, Is Primal Concern in Japan". NPR. 9 March 2012. Retrieved 15 April 2012.
  27. ^ Caracappa, Peter F. (28 June 2011), "Fukushima Accident: Radioactive Releases and Potential Dose Consequences" (PDF), ANS Annual Coming together, archived from the original (PDF) on twenty December 2011, retrieved thirteen September 2011
  28. ^ "The Price of Fear: The Framing of a Fukushima Study". 15 March 2012. Retrieved 1 October 2013.
  29. ^ "Japan PM says Fukushima nuclear site finally stabilised". BBC Online. sixteen December 2011. Retrieved 7 January 2012.
  30. ^ National Diet of Japan Fukushima Nuclear Accident Contained Investigation Commission. "囜䌚事故調 | 東京電力犏島原子力発電所事故調査委員䌚のホヌムペヌゞ". National Diet of Nihon Fukushima Nuclear Accident Independent Investigation Commission. Archived from the original on nineteen January 2013. Retrieved 9 July 2012.
  31. ^ "UPDATE: Regime panel blasts lack of 'safety culture' in nuclear accident". The Asahi Shimbun. 23 July 2012. Archived from the original on 13 Apr 2014. Retrieved 29 July 2012.
  32. ^ Fackler, Martin (12 October 2012). "Nihon Power Company Admits Failings on Plant Precautions". The New York Times . Retrieved 13 Oct 2012.
  33. ^ Sheldrick, Aaron (12 Oct 2012). "Fukushima operator must learn from mistakes, new adviser says". Reuters. Retrieved thirteen October 2012.
  34. ^ Yamaguchi, Mari (12 Oct 2012). "Nippon utility agrees nuclear crunch was avoidable". Boston.com. Associated Printing. Retrieved 13 Oct 2012.
  35. ^ "Japanese nuclear found operator admits playing down risk". CNN Wire Staff. CNN. 12 Oct 2012. Retrieved thirteen Oct 2012.
  36. ^ Martin Fackler (ane June 2011). "Report Finds Nippon Underestimated Seismic sea wave Danger". The New York Times.
  37. ^ "What fuel mix was in use at Fukushima and was that a factor in the accident? Does the United States use MOX fuel?". Nuclear Energy Institute. 25 July 2011. Archived from the original on 28 October 2013. Retrieved 30 January 2013.
  38. ^ Li, 10.; Henkelmann, R.; BaumgÀrtner, F. (January 2004). "Rapid determination of uranium and plutonium content in mixtures through measurement of the intensity–fourth dimension bend of delayed neutrons". Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Inquiry Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms. 215 (i–ii): 246–251. Bibcode:2004NIMPB.215..246L. doi:10.1016/S0168-583X(03)01822-half-dozen.
  39. ^ Hiernaut, J.-P.; Wiss, T.; Papaioannou, D.; Konings, R.J.M.; Rondinella, Five.V. (January 2008). "Volatile fission product behaviour during thermal annealing of irradiated UO2 fuel oxidised upwards to U3O8". Journal of Nuclear Materials. 372 (2–3): 215–225. Bibcode:2008JNuM..372..215H. doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.03.174.
  40. ^ a b "Tepco confirms extra partial fuel rod meltdown at plant". BBC. 24 May 2011. Retrieved 27 May 2011.
  41. ^ "Japan'south Fukushima nuclear institute faces new reactor problem". Reuters. 12 March 2011. Retrieved 12 March 2011.
  42. ^ a b "Seismic Damage Data(the 20th Release)" (PDF). Nuclear and Industrial Rubber Agency. 13 March 2011. Archived from the original (PDF) on 9 Apr 2011. Retrieved 12 April 2011.
  43. ^ "Meltdowns may accept occurred in ii Japan reactors". Aqueduct NewsAsia. Agence France-Presse. 2011. Archived from the original on 22 Oct 2012. Retrieved thirteen March 2011.
  44. ^ Takenaka, Kiyoshi (12 March 2011). "Japan's TEPCO preparing to release radiation from second reactor". Reuters . Retrieved 12 March 2011.
  45. ^ a b "Efforts to manage Fukushima Daiichi three, update 2". World Nuclear News. xiii March 2011. Retrieved thirteen March 2011.
  46. ^ "TEPCO press release 8". Tepco (Printing release). 13 March 2011.
  47. ^ a b "Seismic impairment information (the 22nd release)" (PDF). Nuclear and Industrial Rubber Agency. 14 March 2011. Archived from the original (PDF) on 9 April 2011. Retrieved 12 April 2011.
  48. ^ "printing release 10". Tepco (Press release). 13 March 2011.
  49. ^ 攟射線、犏島原発でミリシヌベルト＝「人䜓に圱響及がす可胜性」－官房長官. jiji press (in Japanese). fifteen March 2011. Archived from the original on 10 April 2014. Retrieved 15 March 2011.
  50. ^ "Radiation levels fasten at Japanese nuclear plant". CNN. 15 March 2011. Retrieved fifteen March 2011.
  51. ^ "Radiation leak feared at spent fuel pool, water injection ordered". Kyodo News. 15 March 2011. Archived from the original on 20 March 2011. Retrieved xv March 2011.
  52. ^ "Urgent: Hydrogen smash occurs at Fukushima nuke plant's No. three reactor: bureau". Kyodo News Agency. Archived from the original on 13 May 2011. Retrieved 14 March 2011.
  53. ^ "180,000 abscond every bit Japan's nuclear crisis intensifies". NBC News . Retrieved 13 March 2011.
  54. ^ "Second explosion rocks Fukushima Daiichi". Globe-nuclear-news.org . Retrieved 15 March 2011.
  55. ^ "An explosion acquired by hydrogen at Unit of measurement 3 of Fukushima Dai ichi NPS (3rd release)" (PDF). Nuclear and Industrial Condom Agency. 14 March 2011. Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 March 2012.
  56. ^ "News Release" (PDF). Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency. xiv March 2011. Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 March 2011. Retrieved 22 March 2011.
  57. ^ 犏島第䞀号機爆発 自衛隊員ら人ケガ. NNN News 24 (in Japanese). xiv March 2011. Retrieved 22 May 2011.
  58. ^ 「有事䞊み」10䞇人態勢の救揎掻動 震灜害ず原発事故の「二正面䜜戊」に挑む. The Mainichi Shimbun (in Japanese). 11 May 2011. Retrieved 25 May 2011. [ dead link ]
  59. ^ Kyodo News, "GSDF colonel recounts fearing for life in Fukushima reactor blast", Japan Times, 7 June 2011, p. 2.
  60. ^ a b Blackness, Richard (16 March 2011). "Surprise 'disquisitional' warning raises nuclear fears". BBC . Retrieved 26 March 2011.
  61. ^ McCurry, Justin (16 March 2011). "Fukushima nuclear plant evacuated after radiation spikes". The Guardian. London. The No four reactor is an increasing cause for business. Tepco believes that the storage pool may be boiling, raising the possibility that exposed rods volition accomplish criticality. "The possibility of re-criticality is not cypher", a TEPCO spokesman said.
  62. ^ "Criticality Safe in the Waste product Management of Spent Fuel from NPPs, Robert Kilger" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 11 May 2011. Retrieved 24 April 2011.
  63. ^ Lebrun, Alain; Bignan, Gilles (September 2001). "Nondestructive Analysis of Nuclear Depression-Enriched Uranium Spent Fuels for Burnup Credit Application". Nuclear Technology. 135 (3): 216–229. doi:10.13182/NT01-A3217. S2CID 94259786. INIST:1068367.
  64. ^ Wikibooks:Nuclear waste Direction/Spent Nuclear Fuel
  65. ^ "Gundersen postulates Unit 3 explosion may have been prompt criticality in fuel pool". Fairewinds Assembly. 26 Apr 2011. Archived from the original on 23 April 2012. Retrieved 27 April 2011.
  66. ^ Underwater robot captures Fukushima wreckage, The Telegraph, 11 May 2011
  67. ^ a b "Radiation high at No.three reactor puddle". NHK. 10 May 2011. Archived from the original on ten May 2011. Retrieved 2 June 2011.
  68. ^ "Japan says 2nd reactor may have ruptured with radioactive release", The New York Times 16 March 2010.
  69. ^ "Seismic harm data (the 26th release)" (PDF). Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency. sixteen March 2011. Archived from the original (PDF) on ix Apr 2011. Retrieved 12 April 2011.
  70. ^ "Video: Helicopters attempt to absurd Fukushima nuclear plant from the air". The Telegraph. London. xvi March 2011. Archived from the original on 17 March 2011. Retrieved 18 March 2011.
  71. ^ "SDF gives up on dousing No.3 reactor". NHK. xvi March 2011. Archived from the original on 19 March 2011. Retrieved two June 2011.
  72. ^ "Major damage unlikely at Nippon nuke plant'south No.three reactor – Kyodo | Free energy & Oil". Af.reuters.com. 9 February 2009. Archived from the original on 26 April 2011. Retrieved xviii March 2011.
  73. ^ "Tokyo Elec: desire military chopper to try over again to douse Reactor | Energy & Oil". Af.reuters.com. ix February 2009. Archived from the original on 26 April 2011. Retrieved xviii March 2011.
  74. ^ Helicopter starts spraying water on Nippon nuclear institute Reuters 17 March 2011
  75. ^ "Seismic Damage Data (the 30th Release)" (PDF). Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency. 18 March 2011. Archived from the original (PDF) on ix April 2011. Retrieved 12 April 2011.
  76. ^ "Seismic Damage Data (the 46th Release)" (PDF). Nuclear and Industrial Safe Agency. 23 March 2011. Archived from the original (PDF) on 9 April 2011. Retrieved 12 April 2011.
  77. ^ "Grayness smoke from No.iii reactor subsided". Archived from the original on 11 May 2011. Retrieved 21 March 2011.
  78. ^ "Tokyo tap h2o tests college for radiations; smoke prompts new evacuation of leaking nuke plant". StarTribune.com. 23 March 2011. Retrieved 29 March 2011.
  79. ^ Kanako Takahara and Kazuaki Nagata (26 March 2011). "Level of iodine-131 in seawater off nautical chart". The Japan Times . Retrieved 27 March 2011. {{cite web}}: CS1 maint: uses authors parameter (link)
  80. ^ a b c d due east f "Records from March eleven, 2011 to 31 July 2011" (PDF). TEPCO (Press release). Retrieved 22 August 2011.
  81. ^ "Plant status of Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station" (Press release). Retrieved 27 September 2011.
  82. ^ "Japan reactor core may be leaking radioactive material, official says". CNN. 25 March 2011. Retrieved 26 March 2011.
  83. ^ a b "Air may exist leaking from reactors No. 2 and 3". NHK WORLD English. 30 March 2011. Archived from the original on 11 May 2011. Retrieved 2 June 2011.
  84. ^ "Press Release | Condition of TEPCO's Facilities and its services subsequently the Tohoku-Taiheiyou-Oki Convulsion(every bit of 10:00 pm)". TEPCO (Press release). 30 March 2011. Retrieved 7 Apr 2011.
  85. ^ TEPCO revises nuclear fuel damage ratios, NHK, 27 Apr 2011
  86. ^ Mitsuru Obe (16 May 2011). "Cores damaged at three reactors". The Wall Street Journal.
  87. ^ "Boric acid added to spent fuel pool of Unit of measurement three". Archived from the original on 2 April 2012. Retrieved 30 Jan 2013.
  88. ^ The Mainichi Daily news (13 Jan 2012) 300 tons of tainted water found near No. 3 unit at Fukushima plant Archived fifteen Jan 2012 at the Wayback Motorcar
  89. ^ "Mutant butterflies a result of Fukushima nuclear disaster, researchers say". CNN. Retrieved 14 August 2012.
  90. ^ The Mainichi Shimbun (18 July 2013) TEPCO sees steam but no crunch at nuclear constitute Archived 21 July 2013 at the Wayback Machine
  91. ^ The Asahi Shimbun (xviii July 2013) Steam rising from reactor building in Fukushima Archived 24 July 2013 at the Wayback Automobile
  92. ^ The Mainichi Shimbun (19 July 2013) Steam coming out from Fukushima reactor building disappeared: TEPCO Archived 19 July 2013 at archive.today
  93. ^ The Mainichi Shimbun (23 July 2013) Steam once more seen at No. 3 reactor edifice at Fukushima Daiichi plant Archived 24 July 2013 at annal.today,
  94. ^ The Asahi Shimbun (24 July 2013)High radiation levels found near surface area where steam spotted at Fukushima institute Archived 28 July 2013 at the Wayback Machine

External links [edit]

  • The Fukushima Nuclear Accident Independent Investigation Commission Written report website in English
  • Executive summary of the Fukushima Nuclear Accident Independent Investigation Commission Written report
  • Fukushima report: Key points in nuclear disaster study - An outline of primal quotes, findings and recommendations from the 88-page executive summary of the Nuclear Accident Contained Investigation Commission'southward report, as provided past the BBC, 5 July 2012
  • Webcam Fukushima nuclear power plant I, Unit 1 through Unit of measurement 4
  • Investigation Committee on the accidents at the Fukushima Nuclear Power Station of Tokyo Electric Power Visitor
  • Schematic drawing of Unit 1 reactor building
  • TEPCO News Releases, Tokyo Electric Power Company
  • NISA Information update, Nuclear and Industrial Prophylactic Agency, the nuclear rubber authority of Japan
  • JAIF Information update, Japan Diminutive International Forum
  • JAEA Information update, Nihon Diminutive Energy Agency
  • IAEA Update on Nihon Earthquake, International Diminutive Energy Agency
  • Nature Journal – Specials: Nippon convulsion and nuclear crisis
  • TerraFly Timeline Aerial Imagery of Fukushima Nuclear Reactor after 2011 Tsunami and Earthquake
  • Documentary photographs: residential harm inside "No Go" Zone
  • In graphics: Fukushima nuclear alert, as provided by the BBC, 9 July 2012
  • PreventionWeb Japan: 2011 Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster
  • "What should we learn from the astringent accident at the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant?" by Kenichi Ohmae, Team H2o Project. 28 October 2011

ealesscontel.blogspot.com

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fukushima_Daiichi_nuclear_disaster_(Unit_3_Reactor)

0 Response to "What Happened to Reactor 3 Cooling Pond Fukushima"

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel